Evidence Hub

Patient Satisfaction and Decision Regret in Patients Undergone Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device Procedure for BPH/LUTS: An Italian, Real Life, Multicenter Study

L. Cindolo, G. Vittori, Fabrizio Gallo, L. Lambertini, Roberto Castellucci, Marco Domenico Salvaggio, A. Turbanti, D. Piccolotti et al.

Journal of endourology, 2026

140 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical technique aimed at improving symptoms while preserving erectile and ejaculatory function. Although functional outcomes and safety have been extensively studied, no previous research has specifically evaluated patient satisfaction and treatment regret. Objective: To assess functional outcomes, treatment satisfaction, and decision regret in patients undergoing iTIND implantation in a real-life multicenter setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 140 patients treated with iTIND at 7 institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Baseline evaluations included International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), International Prostatic Symptom Score-quality of life (IPSS-QoL), urinary peak flow (Qmax), post voiding residual (PVR), and International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF5). Antegrade ejaculation was recorded before and after treatment. Adverse events and retreatments were monitored. At 12 months, decision regret was assessed using the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Logistic regression a less absolute shrinkage and selection operator models were applied to identify predictors of high regret (DRS >25). Results: Median age was 52 years and median prostate volume was 30 mL. All procedures were successfully completed with same-day discharge. Functional outcomes significantly improved: IPSS decreased from 20 to 10 (p <…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free