Evidence Hub

Differential impact of digital therapy on storage and voiding LUTS: A post‐hoc IPSS analysis from the BEST randomized controlled trial

Sandra Helen Schönburg, Christian Gratzke, Kurt Miller, Erik Krieger, Patrick Papp, Laura Elisa Wiemer

BJUI Compass, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether storage or voiding symptoms respond more favourably to the use of Kranus Lutera, the first app-based digital therapeutic for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), using detailed item-level analysis of the IPSS questionnaire. Materials and Methods: The present data represent a post-hoc analysis of the results of the BEST trial, a randomized controlled study evaluating the efficiency of the digital therapy Kranus Lutera. The study period lasted 12 weeks, conducted between 04/2023 and 11/2023. We assessed the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks for each of the seven IPSS items. Voiding symptoms (items 1, 3, 5 and 6) and storage symptoms (items 2, 4 and 7) were analysed separately. Results: Participants using the digital therapeutic demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all IPSS items. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in the primary endpoint (IPSS), with an overall reduction of -7.0 points (95% CI: -8.1 to -5.9, p < 0.0001). Notably, improvements in storage symptoms were consistently larger than those in voiding symptoms. The analysis of individual IPSS questions showed the greatest changes in the overall cohort for questions 1, 2 and 7 (each p < 0.0001). Patients with the single diagnosis BPH (N40) showed the greatest score reduction in questions 2 and 5 (each p < 0.0001), patients with OAB (N32.8) in questions 2, 4 and 7 (each p < 0.0001)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free