Evidence Hub

Utility of pre-transplant bladder cycling for patients with a defunctionalized bladder. A randomized controlled trial

Y. Osman, M. Zahran, A. Harraz, Mohamed M. Mashally, Ahmed I. Kamal, B. Ali-El-Dein

Urology, 2023

23 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the necessity of pre-transplant programmed bladder cycling (PBC) in patients with defunctionalized bladder (DB).

METHODS

This RCT included renal transplant (RT) candidates with DB. Eligible patients were assigned to two groups, group I underwent PBC before RT and group II underwent direct RT into the DB. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of PBC in improving post- RT bladder capacity. Secondly, to compare its impact on early urological complications and 3-month voiding function and 1-year graft function and survival. Graft function was evaluated using serum creatinine and eGFR using MDRD equation.

RESULTS

Groups I included 23 patients and group II included 20 patients. The mean ±SD of bladder capacity was 88.7±11.7ml and 90.6 ±9.8ml in both groups, respectively (P= 0.5). In group I, PBC increased bladder capacity to 194.7 ±21.2 ml (P<0.001). Targeted bladder capacity was achieved in 19 (82.6 %) patients and two patients developed UTI. At 3-months, bladder capacity, compliance and bladder contractility index improved significantly in both groups with a significant reduction in maximum detrusor pressure with no significant difference between both groups (P= 0.3,0.4, 0.2 and 0.8, respectively). Urinary leakage occurred in one (4.3%) and three patients (15%) in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.2). At 1-year, no statistically significant differences in the median (IQR) serum creatinine (P= 0.05) and eGFR (P= 0.07) between both groups were noted.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free