Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
Abstract
THE RANDOMIZED controlled trial (RCT), more than any other methodology, can have a powerful and immediate impact on patient care. Ideally, the report of such an evaluation needs to convey to the reader relevant information concerning the design, conduct, analysis, and generalizability of the trial. This information should provide the reader with the ability to make informed judgments regarding the internal and external validity of the trial. Accurate and complete reporting also benefits editors and reviewers in their deliberations regarding submitted manuscripts. For RCTs to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard. For editorial comment see p 649. Evidence produced repeatedly over the last 30 years indicates a wide chasm between what a trial should report and what is actually published in the literature. In a review of 71 RCTs with negative results published between 1960 and 1975, the authors reported that the vast
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Luteolin rescues postmenopausal osteoporosis elicited by OVX through alleviating osteoblast pyroptosis via activating PI3K-AKT signaling
- Drugs Used in “Chemsex”/Sexualized Drug Behaviour—Overview of the Related Clinical Psychopharmacological Issues
- Luteolin Inhibits Dexamethasone‐Induced Osteoporosis by Autophagy Activation Through miR‐125b‐5p/SIRT3/AMPK/mTOR Axis, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
- Cutting-edge insights into liver fibrosis: advanced therapeutic strategies and future perspectives using engineered mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes
- Can we predict and manage persistent storage and voiding LUTS following bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery in men? ICI‐RS 2023
- Chylomicron-mimicking supramolecular nano emulsion for oral luteolin delivery against hyperuricemia
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.