Evidence Hub

Outcomes of a Novel Penile Traction Device in Men with Peyronie's Disease: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

M. Ziegelmann, J. Savage, A. Toussi, M. Alom, David Y. Yang, T. Kohler, L. Trost

Journal of Urology, 2019

110 participants · 61 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current penile traction therapy devices have significant limitations, including the need to use them for 3 to 8 hours per day. Given these issues, the novel RestoreX® penile traction therapy device was developed in cooperation with Mayo Clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a randomized, controlled, single-blind, intent to treat trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03389854) in men with Peyronie's disease who were assigned to the penile traction therapy device for 30 to 90 minutes per day or to no therapy for 3 months. Study inclusion criteria were curvature 30 degrees or greater with no study exclusions due to complex curvature, hourglass deformity, prior Peyronie's disease therapy or surgery, or calcification. The primary outcome was safety and secondary outcomes were penile length and curvature, and questionnaire responses.

RESULTS

A total of 110 men were randomized 3:1 to the penile traction therapy group or the control group. The cohorts were well matched with a mean age of 58.4 years, a 49.7-month Peyronie's disease history and 59.3 degree curvature. Overall penile traction therapy was well tolerated with only transient and mild adverse events reported. At 3 months men undergoing penile traction therapy demonstrated significant improvements over controls in penile length (1.5 vs 0 cm, p <0.001), curvature (-11.7 vs 1.3 degrees, p <0.01) and erectile function (4.3 vs -0.7, p = 0.01) according to the IIEF-EF (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free