Evidence Hub

Prevalence of peri-implant diseases among an Italian population of patients with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study

P. Papi, B. Di Murro, N. Pranno, V. Bisogni, Vincenza Saracino, C. Letizia, A. Polimeni, G. Pompa

The Journal of Periodontology, 2019

183 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the years, only few authors have studied the association of systemic conditions with peri-implantitis. The aim of this study is to detect frequency and severity of peri-implant diseases among an Italian population of patients affected by metabolic syndrome (MetS).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with at least one dental implant with >5 years of functional loading were screened to evaluate metabolic, periodontal and peri-implant status. MetS diagnosis was established in accordance with the NCEP ATP III criteria, while case definitions of the 2017 World Workshop were adopted for peri-implant diseases. For each implant, probing pocket depths, mucosal redness, bleeding on probing, suppuration, plaque index and marginal bone loss were recorded. Multinomial logistic regression analysed the relationship between gender, diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, presence of periodontitis, smoking, type of prosthesis and location of implants and peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.

RESULTS

183 patients was enrolled: in MetS subjects, peri-implantitis was detected in 36.9% (n = 31) of implants, while mucositis in 60.7% (n = 51), with an OR of 10.01(p = 0.005) for mucositis and OR 15.26 (p = 0.001) for peri-implantitis, compared to subjects without MetS, where 26.3% of implants showed peri-implantitis and 55.5% mucositis. No differences were found for smoking, implant location, gender and type of prosthetic rehabilitation. Patients with periodontitis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 183 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free