Evidence Hub

Long-term visual field changes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in glaucoma patients, case series

D. Alvarez-Ascencio, C. Prado-Larrea, J. Jímenez-Roman, R. Castañeda-Díez

American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports, 2021

11 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Purpose To assess the short and long-term changes in Visual Field (VF) Mean Deviation (MD), Visual Field Index (VFI), and intraocular pressure (IOP) after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in glaucomatous eyes. Materials and methods Interventional, prospective case series. Patients with glaucoma, who required cataract surgery were included. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic assessment and Visual Fields. FLACS was performed in all patients by a single experienced surgeon. IOP was measured during surgery immediately before and after pretreatment suction docking. Changes from baseline in VF MD and VFI, IOP, visual acuity (VA), and number of glaucoma medications were evaluated up to one-year follow-up. Results Fourteen eyes of 11 patients were included. Eighty-five percent were female, with a mean age of 74.2 ± 7.9 years. Nine (64.3%) and 5 (35.7%) were diagnosed with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), respectively. We found a slight IOP reduction after the docking phase during FLACS in both glaucoma subtype groups. No significant changes in visual field mean deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) were found from baseline to 12 months after surgery in both groups. A significant reduction in IOP values was found in all cases from baseline up to one year follow up. No significant changes were observed in BCVA and number of topical glaucoma medications after one year in both groups. Conclusion In our…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free