Evidence Hub

Paradoxical Depressive Response to Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Case Series

J. A. Ontiveros-Sánchez de la Barquera, Luis Alberto De La Garza García, Silvia Viridiana Esquivel García, Guillermo Sanchez Torres, Grecia Alejandra Perez Jalomo

The American journal of case reports, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Case series Patients: Male, 25-year-old Female, 24-year-old Final Diagnosis: Resistant depression Symptoms: Depression suicidal thoughts Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Psychiatry Objective: Unusual clinical course Background: Esketamine is the only pharmacological agent with glutamatergic neuromodulator properties approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency to enhance the effects of serotonin selective or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a challenging and prevalent condition in the psychiatric field, in which patients often experience persistent and severe depressive symptoms, as well as a higher risk of suicidal thoughts and attempts. Esketamine has demonstrated its safety and effectiveness as a pharmacological therapy for TRD. Our report aims to present 2 cases of depressive symptom deterioration and suicide ideation in patients treated with esketamine. Case Reports We present 2 cases of TRD that initially responded well to intranasal esketamine but later deteriorated rapidly, with a worsening of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Upon discontinuing esketamine, both patients clinically improved and showed a reduction in suicide ideation. The evaluation of affective symptoms’ response to esketamine and evolution was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Scale and Clinical Global Impression Severity and Improvement scales. Conclusions: The underlying cause for the paradoxical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free