Evidence Hub

Retrospective review of SGLT2 inhibitor exposures reported to 13 poison centers

Schaeffer SE, DesLauriers C, Spiller HA, Aleguas A, Baeza S, Ryan ML

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of oral antidiabetics prescribed in the United States since 2013. They act by inhibiting reabsorption of glucose in the proximal convoluted tubule of the kidney, allowing excess glucose to be excreted. Little has been reported regarding effects of non-therapeutic exposure to this class of medication.

METHODS: Retrospective records from 13 poison centers were examined for human exposures to SGLT2 inhibitors between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2016. Exclusion criteria included multi-substance exposures and exposures without any follow-up call. Data examined included patient age, chronicity of exposure, clinical effects, management site, treatments administered, duration of follow-up, and outcome.

RESULTS: Eighty-eight cases met inclusion criteria. Patient age ranged from 1 to 75 years; 49 were evaluated in a health care facility with 18 admissions. No symptoms developed in 80 (91%) patients, 6 (7%) developed minor symptoms, and 2 (2%) developed moderate symptoms. Hypoglycemia was not observed. Mean time to final follow-up was 9.3 h, ranging from 1 to 42 h; median was 6 h. Of the two patients who developed moderate symptoms, one was a 65 year old male who developed metabolic acidosis and hypokalemia while taking canagliflozin therapeutically; the other a 43-year-old female who developed tachycardia and mild hypertension following the intentional ingestion of 6000 mg of canagliflozin.

DISCUSSIONS: The number of patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free