Evidence Hub

Diabetic Neuropathy Is Associated With Lower Bone Mineral Density and Higher Fall Risk in Young Elderly Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

D'Onofrio L, Amendolara R, Siena A, Latino A, Risi R, Balena A, Zampetti S, Masi D et al.

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2026

144 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background and aim: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a recognised risk factor for fragility fractures. However, the mechanisms linking DN, bone health, and falling risk remain unclear. We aimed to assess bone health and risk of falls, with their contributing factors, in young elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mild-to-moderate DN.

Methods: We enrolled 144 subjects with T2D, excluding those with severe DN (neuropathy disability score -NDS- ≥ 9) or fracture history. Clinical and biochemical data were collected, including surrogate markers of insulin resistance, such as the triglycerides/HDL (TG/HDL) ratio and triglycerides/glucose (TyG) index. Bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) were evaluated using DXA scans. Falls were self-recorded prospectively over 4 years using diaries.

Results: Subjects with DN (27%) had higher BMI (p = 0.036), fasting blood glucose (p = 0.04), serum triglycerides (p = 0.016), TG/HDL ratio (p = 0.012) and TyG index (p = 0.003) compared with those without DN. After adjustment for gender, age, BMI, HbA1c, TyG index and TG/HDL ratio, subjects with DN showed significantly lower BMD at the femoral neck (0.702 [0.638-0.850] g/cm2 vs. 0.789 [0.717-0.860] g/cm2, p = 0.015) and total femur (0.890 [0.820-1.055] g/cm2 vs. 0.983 [0.889-1.076] g/cm2, p = 0.027). No differences were observed in spine BMD or TBS. However, TBS was negatively correlated with the TG/HDL ratio (r = -0.215, p = 0.013) and visceral adipose tissue (r = -0.310,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 144 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free