Evidence Hub

Serum FGF-23 and α-Klotho Levels in Prolactinoma and Non-Tumoral Hyperprolactinemia: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

Altuğ A, Yıldırım Arı FZ, Mızrak M, Gürsu MF, Kaymaz T, Dönder E, Yılmaz A

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

30 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate serum fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and α-Klotho levels in patients with prolactinoma and patients with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia and to explore their discriminatory performance for prolactinoma. Methods: Seventy-three participants were included in this single-center, cross-sectional comparative study: non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia (n = 14), prolactinoma (n = 29), and healthy controls (n = 30). All patients with prolactinoma had received dopamine agonist therapy for at least six months. Serum FGF-23 and α-Klotho were measured by ELISA, and between-group comparisons, correlation analyses, linear regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: FGF-23 concentrations differed significantly among the groups (overall p p p = 0.075). α-Klotho concentrations were significantly higher in the prolactinoma group [2.908 (1.376-6.257) ng/mL] than in both the non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia group [2.244 (1.432-5.139) ng/mL] (adjusted p = 0.038) and healthy controls [2.204 (0.149-4.917) ng/mL] (adjusted p Conclusions: Dopamine agonist-treated prolactinoma was characterized by higher circulating FGF-23 concentrations than those in healthy controls and by higher α-Klotho concentrations than those in both healthy controls and patients with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Exploratory ROC analyses suggested moderate discriminatory performance for the individual biomarkers and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free