Evidence Hub

Single-photon-emission computed tomography in painful total ankle replacements

Mason LW, Wyatt J, Butcher C, Wieshmann H, Molloy AP

Foot & ankle international, 2015

14 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) in identifying unexplained pain in the foot and ankle has been described, where other imaging modalities have failed. The investigation of a painful total ankle replacement (TAR) is difficult, often not delineating a definitive cause. Our aim in this study was to investigate the use of SPECT-CT imaging in painful TARs.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of SPECT imaging performed for painful TARs in our department between October 2010 and December 2014. There were 14 patients identified who had undergone SPECT-CT imaging for a painful TAR. The mean age was 63.1 years, with a male/female sex ratio of 2:3 and a minimum time from surgery to imaging of 18 months.

RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 13 were positive for increased osteoblastic activity in relation to the periprosthetic area consistent with implant loosening. The most common finding was tracer activity in relation to the talar component in 13 cases. There was additional tracer activity localized to the tibial component in 5 of these cases. In 10 of the 13 cases with prosthetic loosening/failure of bony ongrowth, there was no evidence of loosening on the plain radiographs. Infection was ruled out by using joint aspiration as clinically indicated.

CONCLUSION: In our series, SPECT-CT imaging revealed a high incidence of medial sided talar prosthesis activity consistent with loosening. The finding of a high incidence of talar nonintegration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free