Evidence Hub

Bone material properties in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis

Misof BM, Gamsjaeger S, Cohen A, Hofstetter B, Roschger P, Stein E, Nickolas TL, Rogers HF et al.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2012

45 participants

Abstract

Idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) in premenopausal women is characterized by fragility fractures at low or normal bone mineral density (BMD) in otherwise healthy women with normal gonadal function. Histomorphometric analysis of transiliac bone biopsy samples has revealed microarchitectural deterioration of cancellous bone and thinner cortices. To examine bone material quality, we measured the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) in biopsy samples by quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI), and mineral/matrix ratio, mineral crystallinity/maturity, relative proteoglycan content, and collagen cross-link ratio at actively bone forming trabecular surfaces by Raman microspectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (FTIRM) techniques. The study groups included: premenopausal women with idiopathic fractures (IOP, n = 45), or idiopathic low BMD (Z-score ≤ -2.0 at spine and/or hip) but no fractures (ILBMD, n = 19), and healthy controls (CONTROL, n = 38). BMDD of cancellous bone showed slightly lower mineral content in IOP (both the average degree of mineralization of cancellous bone [Cn.Ca(Mean) ] and mode calcium concentration [Cn.Ca(Peak) ] are 1.4% lower) and in ILBMD (both are 1.6% lower, p < 0.05) versus CONTROL, but no difference between IOP and ILBMD. Similar differences were found when affected groups were combined versus CONTROL. The differences remained significant after adjustment for cancellous mineralizing surface (MS/BS), suggesting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free