Evidence Hub

Importance of quantitative histology of bone changes in monoclonal gammopathy

Bataille R, Chappard D, Alexandre C, Dessauw P, Sany J

British journal of cancer, 1986

46 participants

Abstract

Quantitative histology of bone changes, using undecalcified transiliac bone biopsies (UTBB), was performed blindly in 46 individuals with monoclonal gammopathy (MG), including 17 with MG of undetermined significance (MGUS) and 29 with overt multiple myeloma (MM). Three MGUS presented an excess of osteoclastic resorption (OR) in the vicinity of clusters of tumour cells and developed overt B cell malignancies, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, Waldenström's disease and MM respectively. On the other hand, MGUS with normal OR remained stable (median follow-up = 28 months), with one exception who developed a systemic amyloidosis. In MM, excessive OR was only observed in areas invaded by myeloma cells. OR was frequently normal in active MM lacking myeloma cells in UTBB. Active MM without lesions on radiography had excessive OR. IgA and pure Bence Jones MM appeared more osteoclastic than IgG cases (P less than 0.05). Of major interest was the finding that one third of MM presented histological bone changes similar to osteoporosis, osteosclerosis or osteoblastic metastasis. Two major findings must be emphasized from the current data: UTBB could be of major interest for the early detection of a B cell malignancy; heterogeneity of myeloma bone condition is unexpected. If some changes appear directly related to the tumour (i.e. excessive OR or osteoblastic dysfunction), some others are probably accidentally associated with it (i.e. osteoporosis), both needing treatment other than…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free