Evidence Hub

Comparison of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-IBA in detecting bone metastases: a lesion-basis study

Li L, Chen L, Yang J, Peng D, Xu T, Chen Y

Scientific reports, 2025

46 participants

Abstract

Gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled DOTA-conjugate ibandronic acid (DOTA-IBA) has been successfully synthesized and utilized for bone metastasis imaging. This study compares the diagnostic efficacy between 68Ga-DOTA-IBA and fluorine 18 (18F)-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in detecting bone metastases. This prospective study, conducted from October 2022 to September 2023, analyzed images from participants who underwent 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Lesions were classified into five groups based on anatomical location (limbs, vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, and skull). Morphological bone changes were categorized as osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed. The semi-quantified radiotracer uptake, measured by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), was compared using a paired t-test. Detection rates between the two scans were analyzed using the McNemar test. A total of 46 participants (median age: 64 years [interquartile range: 53-68 years], 28 men) were evaluated. 68Ga-DOTA-IBA demonstrated higher diagnostic efficacy than 18F-FDG in detecting bone metastases in the limbs (73.2% vs. 64.1%), vertebras (78.1% vs. 67.4%), ribs (86.6% vs. 62.2%), pelvis (78.6% vs. 68.9%), and skulls (80.0% vs. 38%). For osteoblastic lesions, the detection rate for 68Ga-DOTA-IBA and 18F-FDG was 83.3% and 51.5% respectively (P < 0.001). The SUVmax of 68Ga-DOTA-IBA was 7.88 (95% CI 7.09-8.66), which was higher than that of 18F-FDG at 3.96 (95% CI 3.57-4.35) (P < 0.001). In participants with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free