Evidence Hub

Proliferative, apoptotic and angiogenic potentials in jaws and long bones osteosarcomas: a comparative immunohistochemical study

Jawad SN, Abdullah BH

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, 2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcomas (OS) of the jaws are uncommon lesions that represent less than 10% of all skeletal OS. It has a behavioral pattern which is less aggressive than their long bones counterparts. This study performed an immunohistochemical comparison between jaws and long bones OS.

METHODS: The study involved 15 jaws and 15 long bones OS tissue samples for the period from 1986 to 2005. Age, sex, histologic subtypes and grades were recognized. The samples were immunohistochemically stained with monoclonal antibodies to Ki-67, P53 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with jaw OS was a decade higher than that of long bones OS. A slight male predominance in jaw OS was found (1.14:1), which was more pronounced in long bones OS (2:1). The chondroblastic subtype was the predominant in jaws (66.66%), whereas (60%) of long bones OS were of osteoblastic subtype. The Ki-67 labeling index and the VEGF expression were significantly higher in long bones as compared with jaws OS, whereas there was no significant difference regarding the P53 expression between jaws and long bones OS.

CONCLUSIONS: Jaws and long bones OS bear a comparable cell cycle dysregulation when quantified with P53 immunostaining, whereas the long bones OS have a higher proliferative and angiogenic capacity than their jaw counterparts when evaluated with Ki-67 and VEGF immunoexpressions respectively.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free