Evidence Hub

Detection of 18fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves

Hyafil F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Burg S, Rouzet F, Benali K, Iung B, Vahanian A, Le Guludec D

The American journal of cardiology, 2012

10 participants

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis progression rate is highly variable among patients and to date remains unpredictable. Evaluation of osteoblastic activity inside aortic valves may help identify patients with fast aortic stenosis progression rates and worse prognoses. Fluoride-18 sodium (FNa) is a clinically approved positron emission tomographic (PET) radiotracer with high and rapid bone uptake. The aim of this study was to test whether FNa accumulates in degenerative aortic valves and can be detected with PET imaging. Five patients with severe aortic stenosis and 10 patients free of aortic valvular calcium on computed tomography underwent PET imaging 40 minutes after the injection of 4 MBq/kg of FNa for oncologic or rheumatologic purposes. Maximal standard uptake values (SUVs) were measured retrospectively in aortic valves using PET imaging. Tissue-to-background ratios were calculated for each patient by dividing the maximal SUV measured in aortic valves by the mean SUV of blood. In patients with severe aortic stenosis, an intense accumulation of FNa was detected in aortic valve region on PET imaging, whereas only low activity was found in patients free of valvular calcification (median maximal SUV 2.6 g/ml/kg [interquartile range (IQR) 2.3 to 3.6] vs 2.0 g/ml/kg [IQR 1.7 to 2.2] and median tissue-to-background ratio 2.2 [IQR 2.0 to 2.7] vs 1.5 [IQR 1.5 to 1.7], respectively, p = 0.008 for both). Intraobserver variability for maximal SUV and tissue-to-background ratio in aortic valves…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free