Evidence Hub

Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment

Coleman RE, Whitaker KB, Moss DW, Mashiter G, Fogelman I, Rubens RD

British journal of cancer, 1988

20 participants

Abstract

Assessment of response of skeletal metastases to systemic therapy is currently dependent on radiological evidence of bone healing. We have performed a prospective study of additional response criteria in patients with progressive bone metastases from breast cancer. Changes in these potential markers of response were correlated with the radiological response and the time to treatment failure (TTF). Successful systemic therapy typically led to a transient increase in osteoblast activity ('flare'), a reduction in osteoclast activity and symptomatic improvement. After 1 month a greater than 10% rise in serum osteocalcin (BGP) and alkaline phosphatase bone isoenzyme (ALP-BI) and a greater than 10% fall in urinary calcium excretion were seen in 14/16 patients with radiographic evidence of bone healing (UICC partial responders). In comparison similar biochemical changes at 1 month were seen in only 4/20 patients with progressive disease (P less than 0.001). The predictive value and diagnostic efficiency (DE) of changes at 1 month in biochemical measurements and symptom score has been calculated. The combination of a greater than 10% rise in ALPBI and BGP and a greater than 10% fall in urinary calcium excretion had a DE of 89% for discriminating response from progression, 88% for response from non-response (progressing + no change patients), and 76% for TTF of greater than 6 months from TTF of less than 6 months. Serum calcium, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRP), urinary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free