Evidence Hub

The radiodiagnosis of bone metastases from melanoma

Potepan P, Spagnoli I, Danesini GM, Laffranchi A, Gadda D, Mascheroni L, Guzzon A

La Radiologia medica, 1994

Abstract

The records of 3,795 cases of malignant melanoma treated at the INT (Milan) from 1975 to 1992 were reviewed. Histologic confirmation was obtained in all cases. Thirty-one patients (0.82%) with solitary or multiple skeletal metastases were identified. The review of conventional films, tomograms, CT, MR and bone scintigraphy images enabled us to detect 120 single bone lesions. The X-ray features were divided into two groups according to typical and atypical skeletal lesions. Typical bone metastases are osteolytic (87.5%), with medullary origin (91.6%), and they cannot be distinguished from other osteolytic metastases on the basis of imaging criteria alone. Lesion growth causes cortical erosion and destruction (46.6%), pathologic fractures (22.5%) and soft tissue involvement (12.5%). Lytic areas usually have ill-defined margins. Clear-cut outline is an uncommon finding. Atypical skeletal metastases exhibit a mixed osteolytic-osteoblastic pattern (10%), which is hardly ever completely osteoblastic (2.5%). Other unusual metastatic patterns include intense trabecular rarefaction with no detectable single lesion (3.3%), the presence of a well-defined sclerotic rim and periosteal reaction (12.5%). Atypical growth may cause extensive cortical destruction and periosteal production resembling osteogenic osteosarcoma. The various imaging methods show that conventional radiology has relatively poor sensitivity because of anatomical reasons, while MRI is the most sensitive method to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free