Evidence Hub

HAGHL genetic variants increase first fracture risk (FFR) in female childhood cancer survivors: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE)

C. Im, Nan Li, W. Moon, L. Morton, W. Leisenring, R. Howell, K. Oeffinger, C. Sklar et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020

1,935 participants

Abstract

10554 Background: Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported substantial sex differences in the genetic architectures of bone-related phenotypes. We investigated sex-specific genetic determinants of FFR in survivors of childhood cancer. Methods: We performed sex-combined and sex-stratified GWAS for FFR using Cox regression models fitted on follow-up age in 2,453 long-term (≥5 years) survivors in CCSS with ~5.4 million imputed SNPs (minor allele frequency, MAF≥5%), with self-reported FFR defined by first fracture at any site after diagnosis. Replication analyses were conducted in an independent sample of 1,417 SJLIFE survivors with whole-genome sequencing and clinician-assessed FFR. All models were adjusted for relevant genetic (e.g., ancestry) and clinical (e.g., height, weight, treatment) factors. Results: Sex-combined and male-specific analyses yielded no associations with P < 10−7. Among female CCSS survivors (N = 1,289, 33% ≥1 fractures), we discovered 7 genome-wide significant (P < 5x10−8) SNP-FFR associations with strong evidence of sex effect heterogeneity (P < 7x10−6) across 2 independent loci with no known associations with bone phenotypes. We replicated these associations in SJLIFE (P≤0.05) for 3 coding SNPs in the HAGHL gene (16p13.3), among which rs1406815 showed the strongest association (MAF = 20%, meta-analysis HR = 1.43, P = 8.2x10−9; N = 1,935 women, 35% ≥1 fractures). We observed increased HAGHL SNP effects on FFR that corresponded with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,935 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free