Evidence Hub

Histomorphologic characteristics of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Koerdt S, Dax S, Grimaldi H, Ristow O, Kuebler AC, Reuther T

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, 2014

23 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a known side effect of the therapy with bisphosphonates. No specific pathologic aspects or histological features are included in the most current definition. This study investigates characteristics of BRONJ with a special emphasis on histomorphologic aspects, evaluating the role of Actinomyces spp. as well as other disease-promoting factors in a formal pathogenetic context.

METHODS: We investigated 23 patients (14 female, nine male; mean age: 66 ± 11.8 years) who received bisphosphonates with a gender- /age-matched control group. Tissue specimens were treated according to local standards and analyzed histologically.

RESULTS: In 18 (78.3%) BRONJ cases, we found Actinomyces spp. colonies. Bone remodeling could be found in three specimens (13%). Eight specimens (34.8%) showed signs of epithelial proliferation. Analysis of dental treatment before the onset of BRONJ did not reveal significant differences (P > 0.20). In 10 patients (83%; P > 0.05) of the reported cases a relationship between dental treatment and the occurrence of a purulent bone necrosis could be observed. Statistically significant differences in thickness of trabeculae were detected between the two study groups (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the important influence of the osteoblast-osteoclast balance in a histomorphologic analysis. Together with cofactors, which are able to trigger the onset of BRONJ, a new pathogenesis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free