Evidence Hub

Association of imaging classification and histopathological grading in primary intraosseous meningioma of the skull

Wang C, Liao H, Luo W, Wei S, Wei W, Zhao Y, Ma J, Su D

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2024

25 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary intraosseous meningioma of the skull (PIMS) is a rare type of primary extradural meningioma (PEM) involving cranial bone. The existing literature strongly suggest the importance of radiological feacures in pathological diagnosis of PIMS. Thereby, the aim of this study is to investigate the association between imaging classification and histopathological grading in PIMS.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, we retrospectively analyzed the computed tomography scan/magnetic resonance imaging and pathological data pertaining to patients with pathologically proven PIMS. The association between radiological features, imaging classification, and histopathological grading was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: In this study, data of 25 patients with PIMS were assessed. The univariate logistic regression analysis results showed significant correlation between histopathological grading and imaging classification (OR: 22.5; 95% CI: 2.552-198.378; p = 0.005), intra- and extracalvarial extension (OR: 7.2; 95% CI: 1.066-48.639; p = 0.043), and tumor margin (OR: 7.19; 95% CI: 1.06-47.61; p = 0.043). According to the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, imaging classification was the strongest independent risk factor for high-grade PIMS, and the risk of aggressiveness of osteoblastic type of PIMS was 16.664 times higher than that of osteolytic type of PIMS (OR: 16.664; 95% CI: 1.15-241.508; p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS: Imaging…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free