Evidence Hub

Spinal Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma: A Clinicopathologic and Radiologic Analysis of Eleven Cases

Yi X, Xiao D, He Y, Yin H, Gong G, Long X, Liao W, Li X et al.

World neurosurgery, 2017

11 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively review the clinicopathologic features and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of spinal solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)/hemangiopericytoma (HPC) tumors.

METHODS: Eleven patients with surgically and pathologically confirmed spinal SFT/HPC were enrolled. Their clinicopathologic data and imaging findings were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: There were 8 male and 3 female patients with a median age of 42 years (range, 26-65 years). Of the 11 patients, 5 were classified as grade I, 4 were grade II, and the remaining 2 were grade III. CT or MRI showed a well-defined (n = 8) or ill-defined (n = 3), oval (n = 4), irregular (n = 3), dumbbell-shaped (n = 3), and striped (n = 1) mass with heterogeneous (n = 10) or homogeneous (n = 1) density. The lesions appeared isointense (n = 4) or hypointense (n = 5) on T1-weighted MRI and mildly hyperintense (n = 3) or hyperintense (n = 6) on T2-weighted MRI. Bone destruction was observed in 7 cases, including osteolytic (n = 6) and osteoblastic (n = 1) patterns. Calcification was observed in only 1 case. On enhanced CT/MRI, marked (n = 9), mild (n = 1) heterogeneous, and marked homogeneous (n = 1) enhancement were observed in this study.

CONCLUSIONS: Spinal SFT/HPC commonly appears as a well-defined solitary mass characterized by a black and white appearance that is marked with heterogeneous enhancement with or without bone destruction.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free