Immunohistochemical evaluation of 95 bone marrow reactive plasmacytoses
Abstract
We histologically and immunohistochemically studied 95 bone marrow (BM) reactive plasmacytoses. Ten biopsies from plasma cell myeloma (PCM) patients served as a control group. In addition, we studied 10 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) cases. Histologically, plasmacytosis varied between 5% and 25% with an interstitial pattern of plasma cell (PC) distribution being characteristically displayed. Immunohistochemically, we did not find any CD56/NCAM nor cyclin D1 expression in all biopsies (95 of 95, 100%), not even a weak, doubtful one; PCs were all polyclonal and CD138 positive. On the contrary, myeloma-associated PCs showed monoclonality for kappa- or lambda- light chain and strong CD56/NCAM immunoreactivity (8 of 10, 80%); four of them were cyclin D1 positive. Osteoblasts exhibited similar CD56/NCAM expression in both groups. Our data confirm the diagnostic utility of CD56/NCAM in the phenotypic characterization of polyclonal plasma cells, suggesting an important role of this particular immunomarker in the BM trephine study of polyclonal versus neoplastic plasmacytic infiltrations.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Irisin Enhances Osteoblast DifferentiationIn Vitro
- Glucocorticoids suppress Wnt16 expression in osteoblasts in vitro and in vivo
- Interaction between Schwann Cells and Osteoblasts In Vitro
- Administration of cinnamaldehyde promotes osteogenesis in ovariectomized rats and differentiation of osteoblast in vitro
- The Effect of the Major Components of Fructus Cnidii on Osteoblasts In Vitro
- Estrogen depletion alters osteogenic differentiation and matrix production by osteoblasts in vitro
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.