Evidence Hub

Changes in quantitative bone histomorphometry in aging healthy men

Clarke BL, Ebeling PR, Jones JD, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL, Fitzpatrick LA

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 1996

43 participants

Abstract

Changes in bone mineral metabolism with aging in healthy men and the roles of various factors in the pathogenesis of age-related changes in quantitative bone histomorphometry in men are poorly defined. To clarify these changes and factors, serum and urinary biochemical parameters and iliac crest bone biopsies were evaluated in 43 healthy men, aged 20-80 yr. The static histomorphometric parameters, cancellous bone volume and osteoblast-osteoid interface, decreased by 40.0% and 19.2%, respectively, between 20-80 yr of age. The dynamic histomorphometric parameters, double and single labeled osteoid, also decreased by 18.6% and 18.0%, respectively, over this period. None of the other static or dynamic histomorphometric parameters changed with age in this population sample of healthy men. Univariate analysis of static bone histomorphometric parameters and biochemical parameters revealed significant correlations between osteoid surface and intact PTH (r = 0.37; P = 0.015); osteoclast surface and serum total testosterone (r = 0.36; P = 0.016), estradiol (r = 0.40; P = 0.009), and FSH (r = 0.49; P = 0.001); osteoblast-osteoid interface and serum phosphate (r = 0.31; P = 0.046); and cortical thickness and serum total calcium (r = 0.38; P = 0.013). Univariate analysis of dynamic bone histomorphometric parameters and biochemical parameters revealed correlations between mineral apposition rate and serum total testosterone (r = 0.32; P = 0.037); total volume-referent bone formation rate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free