Evidence Hub

Superoxide solution irrigation for septic arthritis: a prospective clinical study of efficacy and a widened therapeutic window

Yusoff BAHM, Yusoff MFM, Mohamad N, Ramlan MKR, Nik Kamrulzaman NKA, Aziz Mohamad A

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

17 participants

Abstract

Background: Septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency, with the knee being the most commonly affected joint. Standard irrigation with normal saline does not provide biofilm-disrupting efficacy, a key factor in treatment failure, especially against virulent organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study evaluates the use of Hydrocyn, a superoxidized solution with known antibiofilm properties, as an intraoperative joint irrigant.

Methods: A prospective case series was conducted on 17 adults with native knee septic arthritis from 1 February 2024 to 31 December 2024. All patients underwent standard arthrotomy or arthroscopic washout with joint irrigation using Hydrocyn. Primary outcomes included serial measurement of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and white blood cell count (WBC), as well as knee range of motion (ROM) at baseline, 1, 2, and 6 weeks; ROM was further assessed up to 12 weeks postoperatively.

Results: Pathogens were identified in 94.1% of cases, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (17.6%) and P. aeruginosa (11.8%). Significant improvements were observed in CRP levels (p p = 0.001), and knee ROM (p < 0.001) at 6 weeks. The reoperation rate due to reinfection was 5.8%. Patients undergoing irrigation more than 24 h after admission demonstrated improvements in outcomes equivalent to those treated within 24 h, with no statistical difference between the groups.

Conclusion:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free