Evidence Hub

Clinical and histological characterization of 19 chondro-osseous respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas and 2 respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas in dogs

Forster A, Holt D, Durham AC

Veterinary pathology, 2025

19 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Nasal biopsies from 21 dogs diagnosed with chondro-osseous respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas or respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas were reviewed. Associated lesions included angiomatous tissue (4/21), seromucinous gland proliferation (2/21), and polyps (3/21), and all had chronic inflammation. Dogs had epistaxis (14/21), sneezing (9/21), decreased airflow (8/21), congestion (6/21), and discharge (5/21). In addition to a mass lesion, computed tomography findings (n = 19) included turbinate lysis (10/19), cribriform plate and orbit erosion (4/19), and contralateral extension (8/19). In 16 dogs with outcome data collected 0-49 months after diagnosis, 13 had continued respiratory symptoms, 11 of which received medical management; 2 of the 3 dogs with improvement had radiotherapy/radiofrequency procedures after biopsy. Eight dogs were alive, 5 were euthanized due to the hamartoma (median survival 9.3 months), 2 died from unknown causes, and 1 died from a seizure. Nasal hamartomas are often locally destructive mass lesions that cause recurrent upper respiratory symptoms and may require more aggressive therapeutic interventions for disease control. Diagnosing nasal hamartomas requires integrating the clinical history, imaging results, adequate biopsy sampling of the mass, and the presence of characteristic histologic features.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a report, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free