Evidence Hub

Healing Kinetics of Sinus Lift Augmentation Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules: A Case Series in Humans

Furlani M, Notarstefano V, Riberti N, D'Amico E, Pierfelice TV, Mangano C, Giorgini E, Iezzi G et al.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Sinus augmentation provides a well-established model for investigating the three-dimensional morphometry and macromolecular dynamics of bone regeneration, particularly when using biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) graft substitutes. This case series included six biopsies from patients who underwent maxillary sinus augmentation using BCP granules composed of 30% hydroxyapatite (HA) and 70% β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). Bone core biopsies were obtained at healing times of 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. Histological evaluation yielded qualitative and quantitative insights into new bone distribution, while micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and Raman microspectroscopy (RMS) were employed to assess the three-dimensional architecture and macromolecular composition of the regenerated bone. Micro-CT analysis revealed progressive maturation of the regenerated bone microstructure over time. At 6 months, the apical regenerated area exhibited a significantly higher mineralized volume fraction (58 ± 5%) compared to the basal native bone (44 ± 11%; p = 0.0170), as well as significantly reduced trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp: 187 ± 70 µm vs. 325 ± 96 µm; p = 0.0155) and degree of anisotropy (DA: 0.37 ± 0.05 vs. 0.73 ± 0.03; p p > 0.05), while Tb.Sp (211 ± 20 µm) and DA (0.23 ± 0.09) remained significantly lower (Tb.Sp: 395 ± 41 µm, p = 0.0041; DA: 0.46 ± 0.04, p = 0.0001), indicating continued structural remodelling and organization. Raman microspectroscopy further revealed dynamic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free