Evidence Hub

To Determine the Efficacy of Strontium Ranelate in the Healing of Surgically Fixed Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures Using Intramedullary Devices (Nails) in Tertiary Care Hospital

S. Saifullah, Soomro Zamir A, Chandio M. Shuaib

International Journal of Current Research and Review, 2022

184 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Strontium ranelate is a strontium salt of ranelic acid that enhances bone healing by increasing the deposition of new bone-forming osteoblasts and reduces the function and number of bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Strontium ranelate acts via a dual mode of action with both bone-forming and bone-resorbing properties, and may therefore be beneficial in fracture healing. It is therefore promoted as a “dual-action bone agent. Objective: To determine the efficacy of strontium ranelate in the healing of surgically fixed tibial diaphyseal fractures using intramedullary devices (nails) in tertiary care hospital. Material and Methods: This descriptive case series study was done at the department of orthopedic surgery, Chandka medical college Larkana and was conducted for six months between 1st of July 2021 to 31st of December 2021. Total 184 patients with closed diaphyseal tibial fractures were included. All patients have undergone closed reduction and internal fixation using nail. Strontium ranelate as a single dose for a duration of three months was given. Final outcome i.e. efficacy was measured on the basis of clinical and radiological criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS. Stratification was done and the post-stratification chi-square test was applied. P-value ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: There were 118 were male and 66 were female. The mean age of study subjects was 34.18±9.80 years. The mean duration of fracture was 5.78±3.29 days.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 184 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free