Evidence Hub

Tissue reactions, fluids, and bacterial infiltration in implants retrieved at autopsy: a case report

Orsini G, Fanali S, Scarano A, Petrone G, di Silvestro S, Piattelli A

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2000

Abstract

A 72-year-old patient underwent the placement of 2 screw-type implants. After 5 months the patient died of a massive stroke, and a block section of the portion of the mandible containing the implants was done. The specimen was treated to obtain thin ground sections. A 1- to 5-micron gap was present between the implant and the healing cover screw, and this space was filled by bacteria and calculus; bacteria were also present in the most apical portion of the hollow part of the implant. An inflammatory infiltrate was present in the connective peri-implant tissues. The spaces between all implant components (implant, abutment, and healing screw) can act as conduits and reservoirs for bacteria, which could cause inflammation of the peri-implant soft tissues. In conclusion, the histologic data from this autopsy case may help to confirm the penetration by fluids and bacteria into the internal portion of the implants, obtained from previous in vitro and in vivo studies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free