Evidence Hub

Normal parathyroid hormone responsiveness of bone-derived cells from a patient with pseudohypoparathyroidism

Ish-Shalom S, Rao LG, Levine MA, Fraser D, Kooh SW, Josse RG, McBroom R, Wong MM et al.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 1996

Abstract

Pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP) is characterized by a lack of response to parathyroid hormone (PTH); however, normal skeletal responsiveness to PTH in some patients with PHP type Ia was previously suggested on the basis of clinical observations. To test this hypothesis, we measured cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production in response to various agonists in bone-derived osteoblast-like (OBL) cells from trabecular explants obtained from an iliac crest biopsy of a 25-year-old woman with PHP. The patient was proved to have PHP type Ia on the basis of Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy and decreased activity of stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein (Gs) in erythrocytes. Responsiveness of the patient's OBL cells was compared with OBL cells from eight subjects aged 18-39 years who had no evidence of metabolic bone disease. OBL cells from the patient responded to the following agonists (expressed in multiples of elevation of cAMP, stimulated/basal, mean +/- SE, n = 3): PTH, 3.8 +/- 0.3; forskolin, 8.2 +/- 0.2; and cholera toxin, 56.8 +/- 10.0. These responses were not significantly different from those of control OBL cells: PTH, 4.5 +/- 1.1 (range 2.4-7.5); forskolin, 7.7 +/- 1.4; and cholera toxin, 57.9 +/- 16.2. The normal cholera toxin response indicated the presence of functional Gs. Bone cells from patients with PHP type Ia may exhibit a normal PTH receptor-coupled adenylyl cyclase system in vitro despite clinical evidence of impaired hormone-responsive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free