Evidence Hub

Bone metastasis versus insufficiency fractures due to pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic neoplasm

Martínez Caballero A, Moreno Yubero A, Caballero Carpena O, Serrano Vicente J, Verdú Rico J, Navarro Navarro M, Antón Leal M, Crespo Martínez C et al.

Revista espanola de medicina nuclear, 1999

Abstract

Five cases of patients with gynecological neoplasm (four cervix carcinoma and one endometrial sarcoma) who underwent pelvic external radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy in whom pathologic pelvic uptake was found in the bone scan are presented. The diagnosis was pelvic insufficiency fractures due to radiotherapy adverse effects on the skeletal system confirmed by CT and by the favorable scintigraphy and clinical outcome. Both bone metastases and insufficiency fractures must be considered in the differential diagnosis of bone pain in irradiated pelvises. The bone scintigraphy detects these insufficiency fractures early and can show a typical symmetric uptake pattern. In asymmetric lesions, the CT and clinical follow-up as well as the scintigraphic evolution of the lesions should confirm the findings of the bone scintigraphies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free