Evidence Hub

Guided tissue repair of complete buccal dehiscences associated with periapical defects: a clinical retrospective study

Pompa DG

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 1997

Abstract

Apical surgery can enhance the success of restoring certain endodontically treated teeth. New regenerative surgical modalities, with emphasis on guided tissue regeneration, or GTR, have expanded clinicians' ability to retain teeth that previously were considered to be beyond restoration. The retrospective clinical study described in this article demonstrates that the use of GTR without the use of allograft demineralized bone achieves regeneration that is clinically and radiographically indistinguishable from the surrounding bone. The author presents the indications and contraindications for case selection, surgical management and postoperative findings for this treatment option.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free