Evidence Hub

Low-Grade Fibro-Osseous Lesions With Isolated Chromosome 12 Chromothripsis: A Distinct Entity Or a Low-Grade Central Osteosarcoma With a Novel Driver?

Saoud C, Zhang Y, Benhamida J, Villafania L, Gundem G, Cimera R, Hwang S, Shukla NN et al.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Chromothripsis, a catastrophic genomic event causing extensive chromosomal fragmentation and rearrangement, has been identified in conventional osteosarcoma, contributing to karyotypic heterogeneity. Chromothripsis was also detected in a subset of parosteal osteosarcomas, primarily involving chromosome 12, but not well documented in low-grade central osteosarcoma (LGCOS). Here, we report 2 cases of low-grade fibro-osseous lesions with isolated chromosome 12 chromothripsis, aiming to characterize them by comparing their genomic and epigenetic profiles to those of other bone neoplasms. Case 1 was a 12-year-old male with a destructive lesion involving the proximal left tibia, and case 2 was a 13-year-old female with an expansile lucent bone lesion involving the distal tibia with cortical breakthrough. Both cases consisted of hypocellular bland fibroblastic proliferation. Areas of thin trabeculae of woven bone surrounded by osteoblasts were present. In addition, case 1 showed areas of atypical cartilaginous islands and areas reminiscent of LGCOS. By single-nucleotide polymorphism array, both cases showed extremely complex and numerous genomic alterations involving chromosome 12. Whole-genome sequencing and optical genome sequencing confirmed the chromothriptic event involving chromosome 12. Using the Heidelberg Epignostix sarcoma methylation classifier (v12.3), both cases matched to fibrous dysplasia methylation class. Dimensionality reduction using Uniform Manifold…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free