Evidence Hub

Modern technology complements classic technique: 3D-printed inter-locking cutting guides for frontal sinus osteoma resection and reconstruction with split-calvarial bone graft

Brown CW, Martin TA, Razura DE, Johnson ALG, Horsley NB, Soike TM, Powers JM

Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Frontal sinus osteomas are rare benign tumors that may cause functional or cosmetic concerns. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) offers promising adjuncts to classic craniofacial techniques to improve surgical precision and minimize long-term morbidity.

Patient: A previously healthy 15-year-old male presented with a two-year history of headaches and a slowly enlarging mid-forehead mass. Imaging revealed a 3 × 2 cm frontal sinus osteoma with mucocele formation and erosion of both the anterior and posterior tables, with early mass effect on the frontal lobes. VSP was used to design bi-frontal craniotomy and split-calvarial bone graft cutting guides. A combined approach by plastic surgery and neurosurgery was performed using resorbable plating for reconstruction.

Results: The operation proceeded without complication. The osteoma was excised, cranialization of the frontal sinus was completed, and the frontal bone was reconstructed using a split-calvarial bone graft secured with resorbable fixation. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative day four. At six-month, one-year and two-year follow-up, he remained asymptomatic, with six-month imaging showing stable reconstruction and no tumor recurrence. Pathology confirmed a mixed-type osteoma.

Conclusion: This case illustrates the successful application of VSP, split-calvarial grafting, and resorbable plating for the resection and reconstruction of a frontal sinus osteoma. The use of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free