Evidence Hub

Telengiectatic osteosarcoma of mandible with special emphasis on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics: A case report with review of literature

Eram Khan, Saloni Verma, N. Sivakumar, Pooja Sharma, Shaleen Chandra, Shalini Gupta

Oral Surgery, 2023

2 citations

Abstract

Telangiectatic osteosarcoma (TOS) is an uncommon pathology accounting for about 0.4%–12% of all osteosarcomas with predilection for younger adults. It is most frequently seen in the metaphysis of long bones, appearing as painful osteolytic mass that histopathologically characterized by dilated, blood‐filled vascular spaces lined by malignant osteoblasts along with osteoid formation. It has exchangeable clinical, radiological and pathological features with benign lesions like aneurysmal bone cyst and giant cell tumour of bone as well. Thus, delineating this malignancy from its benign counterparts is a crucial part in the therapeutic management.To report a case of telengiectatic osteosarcoma of jaw in a 17 year old female patient with special highlights on molecular diagnostics and therapeutic modules.A panel of immunohistochemical markers comprising of SATB2, CDK4, MDM2, panCK, CD31, desmin, NKX2.2 and TLE1 were employed in combination with fluorescent in‐situ hybridization to detect the prevalence of rearrangement in CDK4 and MDM2 genes.On immunohistochemistry, the neoplastic cells were strongly positive for SATB2 and negative for CDK4, MDM2, panCK, CD31, desmin, NKX2.2 and TLE1. Fluorescent in‐situ hybridization of CDK4 and MDM2 genes was also negative.Considering its rarity in jaws combined with clinicopathological overlap with other benign pathologies, diagnosis of this entity is crucial in treatment planning and prognostic significance. Moreover, only five cases of TOS…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free