Evidence Hub

Solitary subdural osteoma: A case report and literature review

Lei Cao, Li-Chuan Hong, Chu-Zhong Li, Ya-Zhuo Zhang, S. Gui

Oncology Letters, 2016

7 citations

Abstract

Osteomas attached to the meninges unrelated to bone are extremely rare and their etiology has not been discussed previously in the English literature. Here, we report the case of a 54-year-old male patient with a right frontal subdural osteoma. The patient presented with a ~5-month history of intermittent dizziness. Non-contrasted computerized tomography demonstrated a densely calcified mass attached to the inner surface of the right frontal skull. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed this mass could be enhanced by contrast MRI. Intraoperatively, the hard mass was noted to be attached to the inner layer of the dura mater, and not associated with the bone. Histopathological examination revealed lamellated bony trabeculae lined by osteoblasts and the intertrabecular marrow spaces occupied by adipose tissue, which contributed to the MRI enhancement. It was speculated that subdural osteomas arose from ectopic osteoblasts derived from the embryological neural crest cells. The context of intertrabecular bone marrow contributed to the enhancement on MRI. Simple excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic lesions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free