Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of chitosan and calcium carbonate-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in preclinical in vivo models: a systematic review

Marampa WR, Febrida R, Djustiana N

The Saudi dental journal, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of chitosan and calcium carbonate (CaCO₃)-based scaffolds in promoting bone regeneration in preclinical in vivo models, focusing on bone volume, mineral density, histological outcomes, and biomechanical properties.

Methods: This systematic review adheres to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies published from March 2015 to March 2025 using keywords such as "chitosan," "calcium carbonate," "bone regeneration," and "scaffolds." Eligible studies involved preclinical in vivo research on bone defect repair with chitosan or calcium carbonate scaffolds. Studies were included if they compared these scaffolds with other bone regeneration materials or no intervention. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the SYRCLE Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Thirty preclinical in vivo studies involving 850 animals were included. Chitosan scaffolds showed new bone formation ranging from 40% to 85%, while calcium carbonate scaffolds showed regeneration rates between 50% and 70%. Significant improvements in bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume-to-total volume ratio (BV/TV), and trabecular thickness were observed in scaffold-treated groups. Histological findings indicated increased osteoblast activity, mineralization, and vascularization, especially in chitosan combined with other materials. No significant biomechanical differences were found between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free