Evidence Hub

3D-printed tantalum artificial vertebral body or titanium mesh in anterior column reconstruction post-spondylectomy for thoracic vertebral tumors: a retrospective comparative cohort study and finite element analysis

Lv H, Xu M, Ai Q, Wang F, Zhang Z, Hou T

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025

Abstract

Objective: The optimal strategy for spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for spinal tumors remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 3D-printed tantalum artificial vertebral body (AVB) in anterior column reconstruction by comparing its fusion efficiency and implant-related complications with those of traditional titanium mesh. In addition, this study elucidated biomechanical differences among titanium mesh, titanium AVB, and 3D-printed tantalum AVB using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone TES for thoracic spinal tumors, followed by anterior column reconstruction using 3D-printed tantalum AVBs or titanium mesh cages. Clinical outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale assessments, fusion rates, and complications, were evaluated. In addition, radiographic parameters, such as subsidence and Cobb angle, were measured and analyzed. Complementary FE models (T2-T10) compared von Mises stress, micro subsidence, and micro slippage across three reconstructions: titanium mesh (model A), titanium AVB (model B), and 3D-printed tantalum AVB (model C) under physiological loading.

Results: The comparison between tantalum AVB and titanium mesh in the clinical cohort revealed similar operative metrics. However, tantalum AVB demonstrated superior outcomes for 2-year pain relief (VAS: 0.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 0.6; p…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free