Evidence Hub

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of androgen measurement in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to inform evidence-based guidelines

Bizuneh AD, Joham AE, Teede H, Mousa A, Earnest A, Hawley JM, Smith L, Azziz R et al.

Human reproduction update, 2025

2,857 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biochemical hyperandrogenism is a hallmark and diagnostic feature of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the most accurate androgen measurement for assessing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS diagnosis remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This systematic review aimed to assess different androgen measures [including total testosterone (TT), calculated free testosterone (cFT), free androgen index (FAI), androstenedione (A4), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] for accuracy in diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in women with PCOS, to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines.

SEARCH METHODS: To update evidence from the 2018 International PCOS Guidelines, a systematic search from 3 July 2017 to 23 June 2023 was conducted across Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, all EBM, EMBASE, and PsycInfo for articles evaluating androgens in the diagnosis of biochemical hyperandrogenism. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using STATA 18 software. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% CIs using the bivariate model, while the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) model was used to produce a summary ROC curve.

OUTCOMES: Of 23 studies reviewed, 18 were included in the meta-analysis, with data from 2857 participants (1650 with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,857 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free