Evidence Hub

Anabolic-androgenic steroids on cardiac structure and function in resistance-trained athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cavalcante DN, Romariz L, Neto A, Fante GE, Júnior SMP, Bacca CF

International journal of cardiology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are widely used by resistance-trained athletes, but their effects on cardiac structure and function remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of AAS on cardiac structure and function using echocardiography.

METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of AAS on echocardiographic parameters in athletes, using a random-effects model and Review Manager 5.4.1.

RESULTS: We included 35 studies with 2000 male individuals (834 resistance-trained athletes using AAS vs 754 resistance-trained non-users vs 412 sedentary controls; mean age 32 years). Compared with non-users of AAS, AAS users was associated with a decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (MD -2.25 %; 95 % CI -3.41 to -1.09; p < 0.01), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) (MD 3.34 %; 95 % CI 2.93 to 3.76; p < 0.01). Athletes who used AAS also had an increased septal wall thickness (MD 1.24 mm; 95 % CI 0.79 to 1.69; p < 0.01), posterior wall thickness (MD 1.09 mm; 95 % CI 0.70 to 1.48; p < 0.01) and LV mass (MD 13.29 g; 95 % CI 6.25 to 20.33; p < 0.01). LV end-diastolic diameter was also higher among AAS users (MD 1.09 mm; 95 % CI 0.44 to 1.73; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: Among athletes, AAS was associated with a significant decrease in LV ejection fraction and GLS, alongside with increased septal and posterior wall thickness, LV mass, and end-diastolic diameter compared with athletes who do not use AAS. These findings suggest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free