Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Non-Testosterone-Based Treatment in Hypogonadal Men: A Review

Raheem OA, Chen T, Akula KP, Greenberg J, Le TV, Chernobylsky D, Sikka SC, Walsh TJ

Sexual medicine reviews, 2021

512 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although testosterone replacement therapy is an effective treatment for hypogonadism, there are safety concerns regarding potential cardiovascular risks and fertility preservation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), aromatase inhibitor, and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on total testosterone (TT) levels and hypogonadism.

METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review from 1987 to 2019 via PubMed, Cochrane review, and Web of Science. Terms used were infertility, hypogonadism, alternative to testosterone therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulator, aromatase inhibitor, and human chorionic gonadotropin. Studies that reported an effect of TT and hypogonadism after treatment of each medication were selected. Hypogonadal symptoms were assessed by the Androgen Deficiency of The Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire. Aggregated data were analyzed via Chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS: From literature, 25 studies were selected; of which, 12 evaluated efficacy of aromatase inhibitor, 8 evaluated SERMs, and 5 evaluated hCG effects. For SERMs, 512 patients with mean age 42.3 ± 1.94 years showed mean TT before treatment vs after treatment (167.9 ± 202.8 [ng/dl] vs 366.2 ± 32.3 [ng/dl], P < .0001 [180.5-216.1 95% confidence interval {CI}]). For aromatase inhibitor, 375 patients with mean age 54.1 ± 0.67 years showed mean TT before treatment vs after treatment (167.9 ± 202.8 [ng/dl] vs 366.2 ± 32.3 [ng/dl], P < .0001…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 512 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free