Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the clinical relevance of benefits associated with transdermal testosterone treatment in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder

Kingsberg S, Shifren J, Wekselman K, Rodenberg C, Koochaki P, Derogatis L

The journal of sexual medicine, 2007

1,094 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) experienced statistically significant improvements in the frequency of satisfying sexual activity, sexual desire, and distress with testosterone treatment in phase III trials, but it was not known whether the magnitude of these effects was clinically meaningful. The clinical relevance study was designed to answer this question.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the treatment benefits.

METHODS: This study involved a representative sample of 132 surgically postmenopausal women with HSDD who were enrolled in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials (N = 1094) assessing the efficacy and safety of transdermal testosterone treatment (300 mcg/day) for 6 months. At the end of the studies, prior to unblinding, a sample of women (12%) was interviewed concerning their experiences with the treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women were asked "Overall, would you say that you experienced a meaningful benefit from the study patches?" Changes in the efficacy end points in the double-blind studies were compared for the women who did and did not experience an overall meaningful benefit.

RESULTS: Overall, 33 of 64 women (52%) who received testosterone reported experiencing a meaningful treatment benefit, compared with 21 of 68 women (31%) who received placebo (P = 0.025). Among the women who identified themselves as experiencing a meaningful benefit, the mean (SE) change from baseline in 4-week frequency…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,094 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free