Evidence Hub

Testosterone Treatment in Prostate Cancer Survivors With Hypogonadism: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bhasin S, Burnett AL, Gagliano-Jucá T, Storer TW, Reid KF, Shang YV, Privat F, Chandra MS et al.

JAMA internal medicine, 2026

136 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A majority of men with prostate cancer have low-grade cancer and an excellent prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Hypogonadism and associated symptoms impair quality of life in prostate cancer survivors. Many guidelines, citing a lack of randomized clinical trials showing safety and efficacy of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), consider a history of prostate cancer a contraindication for TRT.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of TRT in prostate cancer survivors with symptomatic hypogonadism.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2 trial was conducted at 2 academic medical centers in men 40 years and older with organ-confined, low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score of 6 [3 + 3] or 7 [3 + 4]). Participants had undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for at least 2 years after radical prostatectomy, a mean of 2 testosterone levels less than 275 ng/dL, and low libido, erectile dysfunction, or fatigue. Patients were allocated using concealed, block randomization, with stratification for age (40-60 years or >60 years) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use. The first participant was randomized on May 13, 2019, and the last study visit was completed on May 16, 2025.

INTERVENTION: Testosterone cypionate, 100 mg, or placebo intramuscularly weekly for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was sexual activity. Secondary outcomes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 136 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free