Evidence Hub

A New Oral Testosterone Undecanoate Formulation Restores Testosterone to Normal Concentrations in Hypogonadal Men

Swerdloff RS, Wang C, White WB, Kaminetsky J, Gittelman MC, Longstreth JA, Dudley RE, Danoff TM

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2020

166 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: A novel formulation of oral testosterone (T) undecanoate (TU) was evaluated in a phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Determine efficacy, short-term safety, and alignment of new oral TU formulation with current US approval standards for T replacement therapy.

DESIGN: Randomized, active-controlled, open-label study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS: Academic and private clinical practice sites; enrolled patients were clinically hypogonadal men 18 to 65 years old.

METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:1 to oral TU, as prescribed (JATENZO®; n = 166) or a topical T product once daily (Axiron®; n = 56) for 3 to 4 months. Dose titration was based on average T levels (Cavg) calculated from serial pharmacokinetic (PK) samples. T was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Patients had 2 dose adjustment opportunities prior to final PK visit. Safety was assessed by standard clinical measures, including ambulatory blood pressure (BP).

RESULTS: 87% of patients in both groups achieved mean T Cavg in the eugonadal range. Sodium fluoride-ethylenediamine tetra-acetate plasma T Cavg (mean ± standard deviation) for the oral TU group was 403 ± 128 ng/dL (~14 ± 4 nmol/L); serum T equivalent, ~489 ± 155 ng/dL (17 ± 5 nmol/L); and topical T, 391 ± 140 ng/dL (~14 ± 5 nmol/L). Modeling/simulation of T PK data demonstrated that dose titration based on a single blood sample 4 to 6 h after oral TU dose yielded efficacy (93%) equivalent to Cavg-based titration (87%). Safety…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free