Evidence Hub

Extrusion of testosterone pellets: a randomized controlled clinical study

Kelleher S, Turner L, Howe C, Conway AJ, Handelsman DJ

Clinical endocrinology, 1999

15 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that testosterone implantation is an effective and well accepted form of androgen replacement therapy, but that pellet extrusion was the most frequent side-effect. The present study aimed to reduce the extrusion rate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the washing of testosterone pellets to remove potentially surface-adherent particles decreased the rate of extrusion of pellet implants.

DESIGN: Prospective, randomized parallel group design in a single centre with consecutive procedures to be randomized (1 : 1) into a wash or control group.

PATIENTS: The study included 251 testosterone implantation procedures in men with known androgen deficiency.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint, extrusion rate per procedure, was evaluated prospectively by telephone contact at 1 week and then 3 and 6 month intervals. Secondary end-points included peri-procedure adverse events (bleeding, skin reaction, excessive discomfort) noted at the time of implant. Bruising, bleeding and infection were also evaluated as later adverse events by telephone and personal follow-up. Explanatory variables recorded as possible covariables included the number of implants used, production batch number of the implants, the operator, as well as other demographic and medical factors.

RESULTS: In the wash group, the extrusion rate was 12% per procedure (19 pellets from 15 subjects) whereas in the control group, the extrusion rate was 11.1% per procedure (18 pellets from 14…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free