Evidence Hub

The impact of transdermal testosterone treatment on quality of life in women with diminished ovarian reserve: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Leathersich SJ, Davis SR, García Martínez S, Blockeel C, Martínez F, Gosálvez A, Humaidan P, de la Fuente L et al.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026

288 participants

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does transdermal testosterone treatment improve fertility-related quality of life (QOL) in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER: Transdermal testosterone for 9 weeks at a dose of 5.5 mg per day did not result in improved fertility-related QOL compared with placebo in women with DOR.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Reduced QOL is prevalent in women with infertility, many of whom have DOR. Several studies have shown a correlation between DOR and lower testosterone levels, and testosterone is frequently prescribed to women with DOR undergoing fertility treatment. Some studies have reported that testosterone therapy may improve wellbeing in pre- and post-menopausal women, though others have found no benefit. There are no studies evaluating the effect of testosterone on QOL in women undergoing fertility treatment.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Pre-planned secondary analysis of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial that included 288 participants recruited between April 2015 and August 2022. Of these, 213 completed QOL surveys both before and after treatment and were eligible for inclusion in this analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: Participants were women aged 18-43 years with DOR according to the Bologna criteria and planning to undergo IVF treatment at one of eight fertility clinics in Spain, Belgium, and Denmark. Participants were randomized to 5.5 mg of transdermal testosterone per day as 1% gel (n = 106)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 288 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free