Evidence Hub

Weight loss is a reversible factor in the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Schols AM, Slangen J, Volovics L, Wouters EF

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1998

400 participants

Abstract

The objective of the study was to further unravel the prognostic significance of body weight changes in patients with COPD. Two survival analyses were performed: (1) a retrospective study, including 400 patients with COPD none of whom had received nutritional therapy; (2) a post hoc analysis of a prospective study, including 203 patients with COPD who had participated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. There was no overlap between the patient groups. Baseline characteristics of all patients were collected on admission to a pulmonary rehabilitation center in stable clinical condition. In the prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial, the physiologic effects of nutritional therapy alone (n = 71) or in combination with anabolic steroid treatment (n = 67) after 8 wk was studied in patients with COPD prestratified into a depleted group and a nondepleted group. Mortality was assessed as overall mortality. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to quantify the relationship between the baseline variables age, sex, spirometry, arterial blood gases, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and subsequent overall mortality. Additionally, the influence of treatment response on mortality was investigated in the prospective study. The retrospective study revealed that low BMI (p 2 kg/8 wk) in depleted and nondepleted patients with COPD, as well as increase in maximal inspiratory mouth pressure during the 8-wk treatment, were significant predictors of survival. On Cox regression…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free