Evidence Hub

A Deep Prostate-specific Antigen Response to Darolutamide plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy Is Associated with Better Clinical Outcomes in the Phase 3 ARANOTE Trial in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer

Saad F, Briganti A, Haresh KP, Vjaters E, Olmos D, Littleton N, Testa I, Srinivasan S et al.

European urology oncology, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improved radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) versus ADT in ARANOTE (NCT04736199). Here we report prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses and their correlation with clinical outcomes.

METHODS: Patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were randomized to darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo plus ADT. The proportion of patients achieving undetectable PSA (<0.2 ng/ml) and ultra-low PSA (<0.02 ng/ml) were determined overall and by baseline PSA category. A post hoc analysis was conducted to identify any correlation of rPFS, overall survival (OS), time to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and time to PSA progression with PSA responses and baseline PSA using an unstratified Cox regression model.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The rate of achievement of PSA <0.2 ng/ml and of PSA <0.02 ng/ml at any time was threefold greater (63% vs 18%) and fivefold greater (43% vs 7.8%), respectively, in the darolutamide arm versus the placebo arm, with a consistent effect across baseline PSA subgroups. Depending on baseline PSA, up to 88% of patients treated with darolutamide achieved undetectable PSA and up to 69% achieved ultra-low PSA. Achievement of PSA <0.2 ng/ml versus ≥0.2 ng/ml was associated with much better rPFS, OS, time to mCRPC, and PSA progression, with hazard ratios of 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.27), 0.14 (95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free