Evidence Hub

Impact of lead-in ADT on grade ≥3 neutropenia in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with triplet therapy

Ni X, Zhao Y, Wang S, Zhong L, Shi X, Li X, Ma Q, Wu Y et al.

Med (New York, N.Y.), 2026

847 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe neutropenia (grade ≥3) is a major adverse event in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving triplet therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of lead-in androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) on the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia.

METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the ARASENS phase 3 trial compared patients with and without lead-in ADT. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) balanced baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. External validation utilized multicenter real-world data.

FINDINGS: The ARASENS cohort included 847 patients (lead-in ADT, n = 748; no lead-in, n = 99). The lead-in-ADT group showed a lower incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia during the first docetaxel cycle than the no-lead-in-ADT group (11.36% vs. 17.17%, p = 0.0328; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.95). Overall survival showed no significant difference. Real-world validation (N = 202; lead-in ADT, n = 136; no lead-in ADT, n = 66) confirmed this lower incidence with lead-in ADT (11.03% vs. 37.88%, p < 0.0001; adjusted OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.09-0.42).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving lead-in ADT experienced a lower incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia during the first docetaxel cycle than those not receiving lead-in ADT. This finding may contribute to improved prevention strategies for grade ≥3 neutropenia.

FUNDING: This study was funded by the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 847 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free